Patrick S.
Market*, Stacy N. Allen, Chris E. Halcomb, Matthew D. Chambers, Christopher W. Ratley,
Ben
Bailey, Nicholas Mikulas, Lawrence Pacini, Mary Stueve, Sarah Parsons, and Andrew Kunz
Department
of Soil and Atmospheric Sciences
University
of Missouri-Columbia
Columbia,
MO
Submitted
to the Electronic Journal of Operational Meteorology for review
31
May 2001
*Corresponding
author address:marketp@missouri.edu
1.Introduction
Portions of central Missouri, including the city of Columbia, MO (COU), experienced a brief episode of convective precipitation on the afternoon of 19 April 2000. Radar and satellite imagery indicate that a narrow line of thunderstorms formed near 2000 UTC on the day of the event, moved through COU around 2100 UTC, and then into eastern Missouri by 2200 UTC. This event is worthy of examination because the thunderstorm development occurred in a region that had been cloudy throughout the day and was sandwiched between two regions of abundant solar heating. Furthermore, an examination of the Storm Prediction Center's preliminary severe weather reports of the day (not shown) indicates that there were reports of large hail from central Missouri.
The
impetus for this study was the debate on the morning of 19 April 2000
over whether to field storm chase teams, and if so, to send them east toward
a region of insolation and high convective available potential energies
(CAPEs)/low convective inhibitions (CINs), or west toward the region of
better dynamics that was blanketed by clouds. With
this effort, we hope to understand better the dynamics of convective onset
of that afternoon. The present study
approaches the time of convective initiation from three perspectives. First,
the traditional analysis of plotted surface data leads the examination
of the environment. Secondly, output
from the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) helps us to reveal the three-dimensional
structure of the atmosphere at the time of convective initiation. Finally,
Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) imagery
(Fig. 1a) as well
as GOES-derived soundings help us to understand the stability profiles
and tendencies at, and prior to, the start of deep moist convection.
2.
Methodology
Observed
surface data, RUC initial fields, and GOES satellite imagery and soundings
at or very near the time of convective development form the basis of our
analysis. With surface data, a subjective
analysis was completed to elucidate the strength of thermal and moisture
fields as well as to locate and assess troughs and frontal boundaries.
RUC
initial fields from 1200 UTC to 2300 UTC on 19 April 2000 were analyzed
in order to find the dynamic forcing for the brief episode of convection. Both
plan view and cross section analyses were employed to express kinematic
and other quantities. Smith et al.
(2000) and Schwartz et al. (2000) have shown that the RUC shows significant
skill in resolving dynamic parameters such as divergence, CAPE, moisture
advection, and wind fields. Furthermore,
the RUC is the ideal model for convective case studies, as it is updated
hourly and has a 40 km grid spacing.
Lastly,
both infrared and visible satellite imagery from GOES-8 are used for the
analysis of this event. The infrared
imagery has a 4 km resolution while the visible images from the UNIDATA
educational floater possess 1 km resolution. The
floater images, which were centered over Missouri and Iowa for the time
period of interest, revealed cumulonimbus tops, wave clouds, and especially,
an area of clearing near the region of, and just prior to, convection onset. GOES-8
also has a sounding instrument on board that samples 19 channels; each
channel senses a different layer of the atmosphere, which can be compiled
into a vertical profile of the temperature and moisture content in the
atmosphere (Holt 1998). From this
vertical information, various parameters can be generated that pertain
to the site-specific sounding. Examples
of such parameters are precipitable water, ground surface temperatures,
and several stability indices. Some
of the stability values, like CAPE and CIN, are calculated based not upon
a surface parcel, but on the level possessing the highest equivalent potential
temperature (q
e
,
most potential buoyancy) among the lowest three levels sounded. The
soundings are displayed on a skew-T log p diagram along with
a first guess profile derived for each sounding location from the Aviation
(AVN) numerical forecast model. As
the satellite sounder instrument scans each 30 km x 30 km area box, they
are divided into nine 10 km x 10 km fields of view. If
the algorithms that determine cloudiness deem that four of the nine areas
are clear, then the values are averaged for that area and a profile is
produced. If less than four fields-of-view
are found to be clear, then no sounding is produced, although other cloud
products can be computed (Holt 1998). (As
of 12 September 2000, GOES soundings were run in a single field-of-view
mode. Still, we emphasize that the
soundings presented here were collected during use of the nine field-of-view
mode.)
3.Case
Analysis - 19 April 2000
a.Surface
Analysis
A
mesoanalysis of Midwest surface features at 2100 UTC 19 April 2000 (Fig.
1b) reveals a complex weather pattern with several boundaries of concern. A
cold front associated with a low pressure center over South Dakota trails
through central Nebraska and southwestward to northwestern Kansas. A
warm front is also evident, oriented from northwest to southeast, through
central Iowa and into extreme northeast Missouri; mid-Missouri is ensconced
in the warm sector of the cyclone.
Upon
closer examination of the surface mesoanalysis (Fig.
1b), the presence of two additional boundaries becomes apparent. First,
evidence of a wind shift line is seen in central Kansas. As
indicated by the surface plot presented here and by satellite imagery from
the hour prior (presented shortly), no appreciable cloud cover is associated
with this feature. Secondly, a dryline
type boundary is also apparent, stretching from central Iowa southward
into northwest Missouri and southeast Kansas. The
2100 UTC isodrosotherm analysis indicates that this moisture gradient is
strongest in northwestern Missouri.
The
strong moisture boundary appears to be of great importance to the weather
across the affected area. A region
of cloudiness (shown explicitly later) existed at 1800 UTC along and to
the east of the strong dew point gradient at 2100 UTC. Convection
initiated (Fig. 2) just ahead of this boundary
in Missouri between 1900 UTC and 2000 UTC. COU
first reported a thunderstorm during the 2000 UTC hour. From
a forecasting perspective, convective initiation in this area may have
seemed unlikely beforehand since this same locale had been under broken
to overcast sky conditions for the roughly six hours prior to 2000 UTC. Indeed,
this cloud band reduced temperatures beneath the band as indicated on the
mesoanalysis (Fig. 1b). Still,
the presence of a noticeably strong moisture gradient (especially over
northwestern Missouri, which was closer to the dynamic synoptic-scale system)
indicates that this is the area in need of monitoring for convective development. The
westernmost edge of the cloud band is sharp and well defined. The
sharp cloud edge is in good spatial agreement with the rapid decrease in
dew point temperatures at the surface.
Four
major boundaries have been located in the Midwest by means of surface mesoanalysis. A
confluent wind shift area in Kansas seems to be of little import to significant
sensible weather. The analyzed cold
and warm fronts are associated with large areas of cloud cover, but minimal
precipitation. The most important
and influential surface feature in relation to convection and cloud cover
over Missouri is the zone of very strong moisture gradient where dew point
temperatures vary from the 30s in northwest Missouri to near 65oF
in the central section of the state.
b.Rapid
Update Cycle output
At
2000 UTC, a narrow band of thunderstorms was developing over west central
Missouri, approximately 50 miles west of COU (Fig.
2). A strong southerly flow near
the surface had pushed 60oF dew points across all of Missouri,
and as far north as central Iowa. Significant
moisture convergence (3 to 6*10-7 s-1) was indicated
at 950 mb (Fig. 3 ).
A
broad 1000 mb low was indicated over eastern Nebraska and northeastern
Kansas, while closed 850, 700, 500 and 300 mb cyclonic circulations were
vertically stacked over north central Nebraska (not shown). A
110 knot jet streak (Fig. 4) extended from northwestern
Kansas into central Nebraska, placing west central Missouri in the right-exit region, although weak divergence (~1*10-5 s-1) is diagnosed. Plan
view analysis shows a q
e
ridge extending from Texas into southeastern Iowa at 850 mb, while high q
e
values were pushing into southwestern Missouri at 700 (Fig. 5a) and 500 mb (Fig. 5b).
Cross-section
analysis at this time is more compelling. Figure
6 shows a deep layer of convective instability over Missouri. Relative
humidity values of greater than 80% are located from near COU and eastward
from near 950 to 750 mb, thus resolving the cloud band of interest quite
well. A sharp gradient of relative
humidity is evident vertically and to the west of COU. Figure
7 shows advection of lower mixing ratios of 10 to 16*10-8
g kg-1 s-1 near 800 mb and just west of COU. This
correlates very well with the strongest frontogenesis (near 800 mb) and
strongest vertical motion (Fig. 8). Thus,
frontogenetical forcing in the presence of convective instability combined
with the thermodynamic impact of the advection of dry air at 800 mb over
a moistening layer near the surface provided the forcing for vertical motion
at the time of convective initiation. While
upper tropospheric divergence was weak, the advection of high q
e
air into Missouri in the lower troposphere suggests that synoptic-scale
forcing in the form of isentropic uplift played at least some role in initiation. However,
it is unlikely that convection would have been initiated within the cloud
band without the presence of frontogenesis on the mesoscale level.
c.GOES
imagery
At
1415 UTC 19 April 2000 low clouds cover northern and western Missouri and southeastern Kansas (Fig.
9). As in Fig. 1b a few hours later, clear
areas include most of Nebraska, southwestern Iowa, extreme northwestern
Missouri and east central Kansas, west of Emporia and Topeka. On the eastern
side of the cloud band, clear skies can be found over most of southeast Missouri.
By 1615
UTC 19 April 2000 (Fig. 10), cumulus
elements begin developing on the west side of the low cloud band as it
treks eastward.
Just
prior to convection initiation at 1915 UTC 19 April 2000 (Fig.
11), there
appear to be more diffuse low reflectivity clouds over the cumulus field
in a region south and east of the Kansas City area. The area shows up clearly
on the MB-curve-enhanced IR image as colder and therefore higher cloud
tops (Fig. 12). A few of the cumulus elements
with cold cloud tops along the Missouri/Kansas border have wispy tops,
indicating the early stages of convection and vertical development. Perhaps
the most interesting aspect of this satellite image is a thin, linear break
in the clouds, oriented northeast to southwest, very close to Whiteman
Air Force Base (KSZL). The band is approximately 110 km long but very narrow,
estimated to be 2 to 3 km wide via satellite grid spacing. This would become
a key feature for the developing convection.
Deep
convection initiates between 1915 and 2015 UTC, evidenced by a line of
cumulonimbus tops just east of Whiteman Air Force Base oriented northeast-to-southwest
and well-aligned with the narrow band of clearing noted in the 1915 UTC
IR and floater images. These vertically developed storms are oriented parallel
to and within the eastern and western bounds of the original cloud band
first noted at 1215 UTC. There are four distinct elements discernible via
the enhanced IR image in the developing squall line at 2015 UTC (Fig.
13).
d.GOES
sounding profiles
At
1800 UTC (Fig. 14c), there is strong enough
surface heating to create a small area of positive buoyancy at the surface,
though the algorithm to calculate CAPE (3 J kg-1) and CIN (0
J kg-1) only account for the lowest two positive and negative
energy areas (even if there are more significant features aloft that are
not captured). In this case, as will
be seen for several of the Kansas City soundings, the CAPE area has increased
and CIN decreased, but the calculated numbers to the right of the sounding
do not reflect the changes. The main difference in CAPE and CIN now versus
the 1500 UTC sounding (Fig. 14b) is the increase
in dew points from the low teens to upper teens below 850 mb. The Lifted
Index drops to -5, indicating very unstable conditions, and the K Index
increases to above 20.
At
1700 UTC (Fig. 15c), CAPE has nearly doubled
again, but this time there is no negative buoyancy layer over which to
stop a lifted parcel's ascent. The surface temperature has increased 5ºC
in two hours, and the K Index now trends upward, the Showalter index tends
toward negative values, and the Lifted Index reaches its most negative
value (-8) seen for this case. The
dew point difference has spread throughout a deeper layer, from the surface
to about 325 mb, indicating the GOES sounding shows a more moist profile
than the AVN.
By
1900 UTC (Fig. 15d), the surface appears to
have reached its convective temperature of 28ºC, where parcel ascent
will begin based solely on thermodynamics in the absence of mechanical
lifting. The K Index rises, but nowhere near the values reached at Jefferson
City, and the Showalter Index, Total Totals Index, and Lifted Index begin
a trend toward increased stability and less convective support.
4.Discussion
The
work of Johns and Doswell (1992) guided this analysis. As
such, three key ingredients were sought to achieve moist deep convection. First,
a moist layer of sufficient depth in the low or mid-troposphere is required. GOES
soundings demonstrate that Kansas City did not have a sufficient moist
layer, whereas the Jefferson City area possessed a sufficient moist layer
up to 850 mb at all times. However,
the surface analysis from the time of the event revealed a moisture boundary
just east of the Kansas City area. Indeed,
both radar and satellite analyses show the location of convective initiation
to be about one half way between Kansas City, and Jefferson City, Missouri. Secondly,
a lapse rate steep enough to allow for a substantial 'positive area' is
needed. The GOES soundings for Kansas
City during 14Z-23Z, exhibited lapse rates of 6º-7ºC km-1
from 850-500mb.The Jefferson City
sounding had a lapse rate (for the same time period) of 7ºC decreasing
to 6ºC. Moreover, the RUC initial
fields clearly demonstrate the deep layer of convective instability over
mid-Missouri just east of the intense relative humidity gradient. Also,
satellite imagery (1 km) strongly suggest that a narrow line of clearing
within the cloud band was sufficient to allow solar heating to destabilize
the atmosphere by 1900 UTC over western Missouri. Third
and finally, sufficient lifting of a parcel from the moist layer to the
parcel's LFC is required to initiate deep moist convection. From
the RUC output we know that the region of convective initiation was also
experiencing vertical motions of -2 to -4 mb
s-1 in the lower to mid-troposphere at the time convection began.
To
conclude, convection on this day did not initiate on either edge of the
cloud band, but instead near the middle of it. This
occurred in the presence of frontogenetical forcing and a clearing in the
cloud band that permitted local differential heating. Chase
teams were not dispatched prior to the arrival of convection in the Columbia,
Missouri, area due to low forecast confidence. The
lack of tornadic activity in Missouri proved the decision not to chase
a fortunate one. References: Holt, F. C., W. P. Menzel, D. G. Gray, & T. J. Schmit, 1998: Geostationary
Satellite Soundings: New Observations for Forecasters. NOAA/NESDIS,
30 pp.
Johns, R.H., and C.A. Doswell, 1992: Severe local storms forecasting.
Wea.
Forecasting, 7, 588-612.
Schwartz, B., S. J. Weiss, and S. Benjamin, 2000: An assessment of Rapid
Update Cycle short-range forecast fields related to convective development.
Preprints,
20th Conference on Severe Local Storms, Orlando, FL, Amer.
Meteor. Soc., 443-446.
Smith, T. L., S. G. Benjamin, B. E. Schwartz, G. Grell, P. Bothwell,
and J. Hart, 2000: A past and future look at the Rapid Update Cycle for
the 3 May 1999 severe weather outbreak. Preprints, 20th Conference
on Severe Local Storms, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 21-24.
Authors
This paper is the result of a class project of the University of
Missouri-Columbia's Mesoscale Meteorology course. Dr. Patrick Market
was the instructor. Mrs. Allen along with Messrs. Halcomb, Chambers, and
Ratley, are all graduate students of the Atmospheric Science Program.
Ms. Stueve and Mrs. Parsons as well as Messrs. Bailey, Mikluas, Pacini, and
Kunz were all undergraduates in the program at the time this study was
carried out.
Gordon, B.A., D.W. Burgess, and R. Rabin, 1998: Near and pre-storm
environments as determined from integrated remote sensor data normal. Preprints,
19th Conference on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN,
American Meteorological Society, 583-586.